Drizz raises $2.7M in seed funding •
Featured on Forbes
Drizz raises $2.7M in seed funding •
Featured on Forbes
Logo
Schedule a demo
Blog page
>
Best Alternatives to Sentry and Bugsnag for Mobile App Error Tracking

Best Alternatives to Sentry and Bugsnag for Mobile App Error Tracking

Best alternatives to Sentry and Bugsnag for mobile error tracking: Crashlytics, Embrace, Instabug, Raygun, Datadog RUM, and GlitchTip compared for teams evaluating a switch.
Author:
Partha Sarathi Mohanty
Posted on:
June 12, 2026
Read time:

TL;DR

  • The two most common reasons teams leave Sentry: per seat pricing scaling to $260+/month for a 10 person team, and quota spikes from bot traffic or bad releases consuming monthly allocations in hours.
  • The two most common reasons teams leave Bugsnag: 7 day data retention on free tier (lose crash data before you investigate it), and Jira integration excluded from free plan entirely.
  • Crashlytics is simplest Sentry/Bugsnag replacement if your primary need is crash detection with zero cost. The tradeoff is one way Jira sync and no ownership routing.
  • GlitchTip is replacement for teams that want Sentry's interface and SDK compatibility without per event pricing. Swap DSN URL and your existing Sentry SDK points to your self hosted instance.
  • Embrace is replacement for teams that need deeper mobile specific observability than either Sentry or Bugsnag provides (session level timelines, unsampled capture, ANR flame graphs).

Where Drizz fits:

  • Drizz is a pre release testing tool, not an error tracker. It reduces error volume that reaches any production monitoring tool by catching crash inducing regressions in CI before build ships.
  • The Jira/Linear integration creates tickets from failed test runs with device context and video prefilled. Fewer production errors mean lower bills on quota based plans like Sentry.

For a full feature comparison of all mobile error tracking tools, see best mobile error tracking tools . For pricing focused evaluation, see cheapest mobile error tracking tools.

Why do teams leave Sentry?

Sentry is most feature rich mobile error tracking tool available. Teams don't leave because product is bad; they leave because cost model breaks at scale or complexity exceeds what their team needs.

Developers on r/devops evaluating Sentry alternatives cite two recurring triggers: per event pricing becoming unpredictable once traffic scales, and dashboard surface area being far more than a crash focused team needs. Several in that thread switched to GlitchTip or self hosted Sentry specifically to keep SDK while dropping cloud bill.

  • Per seat pricing scales fast. Sentry Team is $26/seat/month. A 10 person engineering team where QA and developers both need dashboard access pays $260/month, and that's before event overages
  • Quota spikes from bad releases. A single bad deploy can spike error volume 10x in an hour, consuming monthly allocation in a day. Without spike protection configured in advance, overage bill arrives after damage is done
  • Bot traffic eating quota. Bots scanning for /phpMyAdmin or /.env trigger server side errors that Sentry captures. Without inbound filters, bots consume quota that should be reserved for real application errors
  • Session replay caps. Even on Team plan, session replays are capped at 50 and fill up almost instantly on a mobile app with real traffic. Meaningful replay coverage requires Business plan at ~$80/seat/month
  • Interface complexity. Sentry surfaces an enormous amount of data (breadcrumbs, spans, profiles, replays, issues, alerts, dashboards). For teams that only need crash reporting and Jira tickets, interface has more surface area than necessary

Why do teams leave Bugsnag?

Bugsnag is a solid crash reporter with cleanest stability scoring in category. Teams leave because features they expect to be baseline are gated behind paid tiers, and SmartBear acquisition raised roadmap concerns.

A rant thread on r/androiddev about Bugsnag surfaces three recurring complaints: critical features like advanced search filters moved behind enterprise pricing, aggressive crash grouping that merges different exceptions into a single ticket (requiring manual digging to separate distinct bugs), and proprietary backend deterring teams that want self hosting options.

  • 7 day data retention on free tier. If a crash is reported on Monday and developer starts investigating following Monday, data is gone. Sentry free retains 30 days; Crashlytics retains 90
  • Jira integration excluded from free tier. If your triage workflow depends on Jira tickets, you're paying from day one ($22/seat/month for Bugsnag Team)
  • No ownership routing or suspect commits. Bugsnag doesn't auto assign crash tickets to developer who owns file or link crash to specific commit that introduced it. Triage remains manual
  • No Linear support. Teams using Linear instead of Jira have no native integration option
  • SmartBear acquisition (2021). Some teams on Reddit cite concerns about Bugsnag's independent roadmap and pricing trajectory under SmartBear ownership. Whether those concerns are justified is debatable, but they're a stated reason for evaluating alternatives

Alternatives comparison

Tool Best replacement for Free tier Jira sync Mobile specific Self hosted
Firebase Crashlytics Sentry (cost) or Bugsnag (retention) Yes (unlimited) One way Yes No
Embrace Both (deeper mobile observability) 1M sessions/month Via webhooks Yes (built for mobile) No
Instabug Both (beta feedback) No ($100+/mo) Two way Yes No
Raygun Sentry (bundled APM) No (~$49/mo) Yes Partial No
Datadog RUM Sentry (full stack) 14 day trial Yes Partial No
GlitchTip Sentry (self hosted) Yes (self hosted) Yes (Sentry compatible) No Yes
Rollbar Bugsnag (simpler) 5K events/month Yes Partial No

What does Crashlytics offer as a Sentry/Bugsnag alternative?

Crashlytics is most common destination for teams leaving either tool because of cost. It's only option that's genuinely free with no event limits, no seat limits, and no paid tiers.

  • ProGuard/R8 and dSYM upload: automatic via Gradle plugin (Android) and Xcode build phase (iOS), with no CLI scripting required
  • ANR monitoring: automatic on Android (18.3.0+) and iOS hang detection
  • Jira: one way sync (creates Bug type tickets), no custom field mapping, no ownership routing
  • Retention: 90 days (longer than Sentry free at 30 days and Bugsnag free at 7 days)
  • Alerting: velocity alerts (fires when a crash type affects X% of sessions in 30 minutes)

The migration from Sentry or Bugsnag to Crashlytics is straightforward: add Firebase SDK, remove old SDK, and configure Gradle plugin or Xcode build phase for symbol upload. The feature you lose is automated triage (two way Jira sync, ownership routing, suspect commits).

For full Android specific breakdown, see best error tracking tools for Android. For iOS, see best error tracking tools for iOS.

What does Embrace offer as a Sentry/Bugsnag alternative?

Embrace is alternative for teams that need deeper mobile observability than Sentry or Bugsnag provides. It's built for mobile from ground up, not adapted from a web first platform.

  • Session capture: 100% of user sessions (unsampled), while Sentry and Bugsnag sample to reduce cost. Rare edge case crashes on specific device/OS combinations don't get lost in noise
  • Session timeline: every network call, foreground/background transition, memory pressure event, and user action leading up to crash, reconstructed as a structured event timeline (not video)
  • ANR/hang analysis: flame graphs showing exactly which methods and third party SDKs blocked main thread, with continuous stack sampling starting at 1 second of blocking
  • Startup crashes: captures crashes during app launch before other SDKs finish initializing
  • OpenTelemetry: native OTel SDKs let you export mobile telemetry to Grafana, Datadog, or Jaeger without vendor lock in
  • Jira: not native, wire via webhooks or middleware. Alerting integrates with PagerDuty and Opsgenie
  • Price: free tier at 1M sessions/month, paid plans are contact us

Mobile developers on r/reactnative comparing observability tools note that Embrace's mobile first UI is more intuitive for new engineers than Sentry's dense dashboard, and unsampled session capture catches edge case crashes that sampled tools miss entirely. The tradeoff they cite: no native Jira integration means wiring your own webhook layer for ticket creation.

The tradeoff vs Sentry: Embrace doesn't have two way Jira sync, suspect commits, or ownership routing. The tradeoff vs Bugsnag: Embrace doesn't have a stability score dashboard per release.

What does Instabug offer as a Sentry/Bugsnag alternative?

Instabug is alternative for teams that need user feedback layer that Sentry and Bugsnag lack. The crash reporting itself is thinner, but pre crash context is richer.

  • Shake to report: beta testers submit bug reports with automatic device metadata, network logs, console logs, and sequential user steps attached
  • Pre crash recording: 60 second screen recording before crash, reconstructing user's journey
  • Jira: two way via Atlassian Marketplace add on with custom field mapping
  • Price: no free tier, starts at $100+/month

Instabug is worth evaluating if your primary pain with Sentry/Bugsnag is "crash report doesn't give me enough context to reproduce issue." If your primary pain is cost or triage automation, Instabug makes problem worse (higher price, no ownership routing).

What does GlitchTip offer as a Sentry alternative?

GlitchTip is alternative for teams that want Sentry's SDK compatibility and interface without per event cloud pricing. It's open source and Sentry SDK compatible.

  • Migration path: change DSN URL in your existing Sentry SDK initialization. No code changes, no new SDK integration. Your sentry-cli, Gradle plugin, and Xcode build phase uploads work with GlitchTip's API
  • Deployment: Docker Compose on a $5-20/month cloud instance for unlimited events
  • Features: crash reporting, error grouping, alerting, Jira integration. No session replay, no anomaly detection, no ownership routing
  • Maintenance: you handle upgrades, storage scaling, and backups with no vendor support

A thread on r/selfhosted comparing self hosted options highlights resource gap: full self hosted Sentry demands 8-16GB RAM (Kafka, Zookeeper, ClickHouse), while GlitchTip runs on 4 containers (Web, Worker, Postgres, Redis) with 2 vCPUs and 2GB RAM. For teams that want Sentry SDK compatibility without infrastructure overhead of self hosted Sentry, GlitchTip is lighter path.

GlitchTip is lowest friction Sentry alternative because migration is a DSN swap, not an SDK replacement.

What does Raygun offer as a Sentry/Bugsnag alternative?

Raygun bundles crash reporting, real user monitoring, and APM in a single product. For teams currently paying for Sentry + a separate APM tool, bundle can be cheaper.

  • Crash reporting: supports iOS and Android with automatic symbolication
  • Real user monitoring: tracks page load times, network errors, and user session data alongside crash data
  • APM: server side performance monitoring bundled in same dashboard
  • Price: Small Business plan at ~$49/month. No free tier
  • Jira: supported

The tradeoff: Raygun's mobile specific capabilities (ANR grouping, OEM fragmentation handling, breadcrumb depth) are less mature than Sentry's or Embrace's. It's strongest for teams that want one dashboard for crashes + performance without buying separate tools.

What does Datadog RUM offer as a Sentry/Bugsnag alternative?

Datadog RUM (Real User Monitoring) is alternative for teams already using Datadog for backend observability and wanting mobile crash data in same platform.

  • Full stack correlation: trace a mobile crash through backend API call that caused it, in a single dashboard
  • Mobile SDK: supports iOS and Android with crash reporting, session replay, and performance metrics
  • Price: usage based, typically starting at enterprise pricing. 14 day free trial
  • Jira: supported via Datadog's integration marketplace

The tradeoff: Datadog RUM is a full stack observability investment, not a lightweight crash reporting swap. If you're only replacing Sentry's crash reporting, Datadog is overkill; if you're consolidating mobile + backend observability into one platform, it's worth evaluating.

What does Rollbar offer as a Bugsnag alternative?

Rollbar is a simpler error tracking tool than Sentry with a free tier (5,000 events/month). For teams leaving Bugsnag because of feature limitations but not needing Sentry's full complexity, Rollbar is middle ground.

  • Free tier: 5,000 events/month, 30 day retention (vs Bugsnag's 7 day retention on free)
  • Mobile: supports iOS and Android via SDKs, but mobile specific features (ANR grouping, OEM handling) are less mature than Sentry or Crashlytics
  • Jira: supported with two way sync on paid plans
  • Deploy tracking: links errors to specific deploys, similar to Sentry's release health

The tradeoff: Rollbar's mobile SDK is functional but not mobile first. It's strongest for teams with a mixed web + mobile stack who want one error tracker across both.

How complex is SDK migration?

The migration effort varies by what you're switching from and to.

  • Sentry to Crashlytics: remove Sentry SDK, add Firebase SDK, configure Gradle plugin (Android) or Xcode build phase (iOS) for symbol upload. Rebuild alert rules in Firebase. Medium effort (1-2 days for a small app)
  • Sentry to GlitchTip: change DSN URL in your Sentry SDK initialization. No SDK swap, no code changes. Low effort (minutes)
  • Sentry to Embrace: remove Sentry SDK, add Embrace SDK, configure symbol upload. Rebuild alerting via PagerDuty/Opsgenie webhooks. Medium effort (1-2 days)
  • Bugsnag to Sentry: remove Bugsnag SDK, add Sentry SDK, configure sentry-cli or Gradle plugin for symbol upload. Configure Jira integration, ownership rules, and alert conditions. Medium effort (2-3 days)
  • Bugsnag to Crashlytics: remove Bugsnag SDK, add Firebase SDK. Low medium effort (1 day)

The biggest migration cost isn't SDK swap. It's rebuilding alert rules, Jira integration configuration, and triage workflow in new tool.

Choose by reason for switching

Reason for leaving Best alternative Why
Sentry too expensive at scale Crashlytics $0, unlimited events, automatic symbol upload
Sentry too expensive, want same SDK GlitchTip DSN swap, Sentry compatible, self hosted unlimited
Sentry too complex Crashlytics or Rollbar Simpler interface, fewer configuration surfaces
Bugsnag retention too short Crashlytics (90 days) or Sentry (30 days free, 90 on Team) Longer retention on free/low cost tiers
Bugsnag missing Jira on free tier Sentry (basic Jira on free) or Crashlytics (one way Jira, free) Jira integration without a paid plan
Need deeper mobile observability Embrace Unsampled sessions, ANR flame graphs, startup crash capture
Need beta user feedback Instabug Shake to report, pre crash recording, in app chat
Want crash + APM in one tool Raygun or Datadog RUM Bundled monitoring reduces tool count
Want to prevent crashes, not just detect Drizz + any production tool Pre release regression testing on real devices

FAQ

What are best alternatives to Sentry for mobile error tracking?

Firebase Crashlytics ($0, unlimited) for cost, GlitchTip (Sentry compatible SDKs, self hosted) for same SDK with no cloud pricing, and Embrace (mobile native, unsampled sessions) for deeper observability. iOS developers on r/iOSProgramming evaluating alternatives most frequently land on Crashlytics for cost and Sentry for features, with Embrace gaining traction for teams that need session level debugging beyond what either provides.

What are best alternatives to Bugsnag for mobile error tracking?

Sentry Team ($26/seat/month) for two way Jira sync and ownership routing that Bugsnag lacks, Crashlytics for free crash reporting with 90 day retention (vs Bugsnag's 7 days), and Embrace for mobile specific session debugging that Bugsnag doesn't provide.

Can I use my existing Sentry SDK with GlitchTip?

Yes, GlitchTip is Sentry SDK compatible. Change DSN URL in your Sentry SDK initialization and your crash reports flow to your self hosted GlitchTip instance with no SDK swap and no code changes.

How long does it take to migrate from Sentry to Crashlytics?

For a small app, 1-2 days. The SDK swap itself takes hours, but rebuilding alert rules, Jira integration, and triage workflows in Firebase takes remaining time.

Why do teams leave Sentry?

Per seat pricing scaling at team sizes above 5 ($260/month for 10 seats), quota spikes from bot traffic or bad releases consuming monthly allocations, session replay caps filling instantly on Team plan, and interface complexity exceeding what crash focused teams need.

Why do teams leave Bugsnag?

7 day data retention on free tier, Jira integration excluded from free plan, no ownership routing or suspect commits for automated triage, no Linear support, and roadmap concerns following SmartBear acquisition in 2021.

Is Crashlytics a good replacement for Sentry?

Crashlytics covers crash detection, ANR monitoring, and symbolication for $0 with 90 day retention. The gap vs Sentry is two way Jira sync, ownership routing, suspect commits, anomaly detection, and session replay, but if you only need crash detection and alerting, Crashlytics is sufficient.

How does pre release testing reduce need for error tracking tools?

Crashes caught by E2E tests on real devices in CI never reach production monitoring. On quota based plans like Sentry, fewer production errors mean lower monthly event consumption and smaller bills.

About the Author:

Partha Sarathi Mohanty
Co-founder & CPO, Drizz
ISB-trained product leader with battle scars from Mensa, Zolo, BlackBuck, and Shadowfax, now turning AI-native testing into an actual roadmap.
Schedule a demo